I originally wrote this post for the Seer Interactive blog.
SEMrush is powerful, versatile and all things considered, remarkably accurate. With that being said, SEMrush’s advanced features can be both a gift and a curse. With advanced functionality often comes complexity and it’s fairly easy to get lost in SEMrush’s broad array of features.
This guide will serve as a walk through of SEMrush’s most useful ones. I’ve broken the guide into five parts: organic rankings, keyword research, mobile user experience, competitor insights, and backlink data. Under these five topics, I’ve included how-tos on features in SEMrush to use in relation topic for your SEO endeavors.
It happens all the time – you’re on Pinterest and see something so cool that you immediately want to find out what it is, and where you can purchase it. Basically, an experience right out of a marketer’s dream.
If the Pinterest image you’ve landed on is the focus item in the Pin, then it’s quite easy to find a place to buy it, either right on Pinterest or elsewhere online. But what if you’re interested in a specific item in only a small part of a photo? Or what if you want to see other photos of the item that aren’t exact matches, but are similar?
This is where Pinterest’s new visual search shines. It gives you the ability to search Pinterest for pins that visually resemble the one you’re looking at, or search for a specific item within the photo.
With Pinterest being a must-have platform for marketers, it’s important to understand how this feature works and what marketers stand to gain from it. In the sections that follow, we’ll illustrate this feature’s capabilities and suggest marketing strategies to begin thinking about in regards to this new Pinterest feature.
As social media manager for Bicycle Depot, I used social media and content marketing to drive business. Not long ago a piece of content, combined with smart social media strategy achieved great success locally. Here’s how and why several digital marketing strategies came together successfully.
San Francisco, California. Boulder, Colorado. Washington, DC. Despite the diversity of these cities, they all have one thing in common – they rank highly on Bicycling Magazine’s list of the Top 50 Bike Friendly Cities in the U.S. What makes these cities bike friendly and what can we learn from them?
26 is dead. This phrase has been uttered on the internet, on bike rides, and in bike shops all across America.
Log on to forums like MTBR or Pinkbike and you’ll read hundreds of posts bemoaning the loss of the 26″ wheel size and declaring that 650b is a marketing gimmick crafted by the bike industry to sell more stuff. You’ll also read posts from hundreds of riders who’ve just converted to the “Goldilocks” wheel size. So which is it? Let’s check some facts and then attempt to speculate.
Is 650b an effort to sell more stuff? Of course it is. The entire bike industry spends an awful lot of time thinking of ways to sell more product. For the vast majority of us, riding bikes is a leisure activity. We don’t need a new bike, we don’t need lighter handlebars, we don’t need an extra 10mm of fork travel. We buy these things because we want them. And despite the fact that our current bikes are perfectly good, we’ll always drool over a bike that’s newer and better. The industry would be foolish not to recognize this and capitalize on it.
Typical marketing department at a bike company.
That being said, some comments would lead you to believe that the marketing departments of bike companies are board rooms full of fat men in suits smoking cigars and trying to think of the next way they can screw the consumer to make a buck. That simply isn’t accurate. Sure, companies like Specialized, Trek, Cannondale and Giant have large marketing departments and have a big advertising budget. Every business has acquisition costs and for manufacturers of that magnitude, they are high. Realize too that a ton of marketing money is spent in ways that benefit riders (bike parks, events, races, etc.) In general, the people that work in the industry are riders too and their focus is to make better stuff, because better stuff sells.
Right now 650b mountain bikes are selling. Not just selling, but selling like hotcakes. In a thread on the MTBR forums John Pentecost, International Sales Manager for Yeti Cycles, claimed that Yeti’s 27.5″ wheeled bikes were outselling their 26ers at a ratio of 50 to 1. I’ll repeat that: 50 to 1. With statistics like that, any bike company would be foolish not to increase sales 5000% by offering a 650b model. The buying public has spoken with their wallets and 650b is the size they want.
This guy clearly has the wrong wheel size.
“The Butt Test”
Saddle time and the butt test are what really matter. Santa Cruz claims that they test rode prototypes with both wheelsizes back to back and didn’t notice any substantial difference. They suspected that 650b would sell better, so that’s what they went with. The key factor to keep in mind is that the bikes certainly won’t ride poorly. Worst case scenario, there’s no noticeable difference from a 26″ bike and that won’t necessarily deter riders from buying one, if they’re already in the market for a new bike.
Numbers and Statistics
Anecdotal evidence aside, is there a quantifiable performance benefit? Let’s look at some numbers and dispel some myths. While “650b” may be confusing to consumers, the alternative is downright misleading. 27.5″ would indicate that the wheelsize is smack dab in the middle of 26″ and 29″ which is not true. Let’s compare the effective rim diameter (ERD) of the three wheelsizes.
Image Courtesy of BikeRumor
26″ 559mm (100%)
650b 584mm (104.5%)
29″ 622mm (111.3%)
As you can see, a 650b rim is 4.5% larger than a 26er. Compare that to a 29er wheel which is 11.3% larger and 650b is not the Goldilocks wheelsize that some would suggest. Secondly, these calculations only take into account rim diameter and do not factor in variations in tire size, sidewall height or rim width. A 26″ wheel with a large tire can come very close to the overall diameter of a 27.5″ wheel with a slightly smaller tire. 29ers still have a significant size advantage over both wheelsizes, regardless of tire size.
The 650b Trend
So how did we get here? 650b has gone from niche fringe category to unbelievably popular in less than a year. Compared to the ten plus years it took 29ers to become truly mainstream, that’s unheard of. Consumers claim that they’re buying 650b because the 26″ option is gone and it’s being forced upon them. Manufacturers claim that consumer demand has driven the development of the wheel size. It’s truly a chicken-or-the-egg scenario and there’s no definitive answer.
I hypothesize it’s a combination of both. In this fast paced industry where developments occur rapidly and components can become outdated in a calendar year, consumers are tired and leery of investing in products that they suspect won’t be supported in the near future. They’re looking at the writing on the wall for 26″ wheels and spending their money on what they think will be the most future-proof.
Some hypothesize that to avoid more lost opportunities, bike companies have decided to jump on the 650b bandwagon early. A lot of manufacturers played the wait-and-see game with the 29″ wheelsize and lost out on potential sales because they had no bikes to offer and were late to market.
Today’s misadventure in the use of mountain biking for marketing and advertising purposes is brought to you by Rustoleum!
In the latest issue of Popular Mechanics, Rustoleum has an ad for their NeverWet waterproof coating. Not surprisingly, the ad features mountain biking and declares NeverWet as the ideal solution for muddy rides where dirt sticks to your bike and water works its way into the bearings and corrodes everything right to hell. In fact, the ad even proclaims that “If you’re not getting mud and water in every crevice of your mountain bike, sorry but you’re not really mountain biking.”
Jeez, where do I even begin? I could write an entire chapter on trail advocacy – avoiding muddy trails in order to prevent erosion and increase sustainability, IMBA’s rules of the trail, etc. But responsible trail use doesn’t portray the “aggro” image (and stereotype) that makes mountain biking so popular as an advertising tool.
Then there’s a short video at DIYtransformation.com depicting Towner Dyer going on a mountain bike ride, which conveniently enough involves walking the bike through all of the stream crossings that would typically cover a bike in mud. Of course Towner Dyer isn’t riding the bike – it’s not his. It’s also not a mountain bike. The bike in the photos and video is a 2013 Trek Neko S which is a hybrid bike designed for a mix of paved and unpaved trails. It’s also a women’s specific model. Normally I wouldn’t consider that a big deal, except for Rustoleum’s previous claims about what constitutes “really mountain biking.”
A woman actually RIDING the Trek Neko
Why this doesn’t work: If you’re TRULY trying to cater to the mountain biking demographic, you have to illustrate that you have even the slightest understanding of the sport. Mountain bikers ride through shallow water crossings. They wear helmets. And they don’t go riding in denim jeans. Oh and…they generally ride MOUNTAIN BIKES.
Here it is at long last: the official Oneonta segment for From Where We Stand. I’ve already harped on this a lot so I’ll make this quick and slightly philosophical.
I’m glad that I had a hand in this. At 24, I’ve spent most of my life consuming and myself and many of my peers are beginning to wonder what purpose we serve and how we’re going to give back. Building trail leaves a lasting legacy that with frequent use is unlikely to disappear for many years. I’ve made my mark in a sense. I can only hope that I didn’t peak early and that the rest of my life will be filled with projects that I can be just as proud of.
Chris Berkley Digital Marketing
1700 Frankford Avenue Apt 2B
Philadelphia, PA 19125